Study packages
Study packages
A package is an assembly of studies this laboratory already runs, arranged around a single submission so that one quality system, one archive and one chain of custody carry the whole dossier.
- Packages
- 03
- Studies listed
- 67
- Frameworks
- 15
What a package is
An assembly, not an invention.
The catalogue does not change. Only the order you read it in.
- Packages
- 03
- Studies listed
- 67
- 01
Nothing here is new
Every study named in every package is already run by a named division of this laboratory, under the accreditation that division already holds. Packaging changes the order of the list, not the list.
- 02
Grouped by submission, not by department
A registration dossier does not arrive one division at a time. The groupings follow the schedule a regulatory affairs team actually works to, which is why a single package can cross ecotoxicology, chemistry and entomology.
- 03
A starting point, not a fixed bill
Scope is set by the authority reading the dossier and by the properties of the item itself — a surface-contact device should not be paying for implantation work it does not need. Every package is trimmed, and often extended, before it becomes a protocol.
The ledger
Three submissions, opened line by line.
Open a row to see the whole schedule: the frameworks it is assembled against, the divisions that execute it, and every study group inside it.
Ecotoxicity, residue, environmental fate and efficacy assembled as one submission
Built for registrants filing into several jurisdictions at once. Aquatic, terrestrial and avian ecotoxicity run alongside residue analysis, environmental fate and field efficacy, assembled as one body of evidence rather than a stack of unrelated studies.
Assembled against
- OECD
- CIBRC
- EPA
- EFSA
Divisions executing — 04
Aquatic ecotoxicity
- Fish acute toxicity (OECD 203)
- Daphnia acute immobilisation (OECD 202)
- Daphnia reproduction (OECD 211)
- Algal growth inhibition (OECD 201)
- Bioaccumulation in fish (OECD 305)
Terrestrial ecotoxicity
- Earthworm acute toxicity (OECD 207)
- Earthworm reproduction (OECD 222)
- Honeybee toxicity (OECD 213)
- Terrestrial plant seedling growth (OECD 208)
- OECD 218
- Avian oral toxicity
Environmental fate
- Ready biodegradability (OECD 301)
- Aerobic and anaerobic soil transformation (OECD 307)
- Adsorption/desorption batch equilibrium (OECD 106)
- Adsorption coefficient by HPLC (OECD 121)
- Photodegradation, leaching and volatility
Residue & metabolism
- Pesticide residue analysis in crops and soil
- Multi-residue analytical method development
- Plant metabolism pathway identification
- Metabolite profiling and identification
Efficacy & crop safety
- Field efficacy trials
- Crop tolerance studies
- Phytotoxicity assessment
- Seed germination and seedling emergence
Physicochemical, toxicological and environmental data for multi-market declarations
One evidence base supporting REACH, RoHS, CLP, GHS and California Proposition 65 declarations, including the specialist testing — Chromium VI, SVHC, packaging compatibility — that generic packages leave out.
Assembled against
- REACH
- RoHS
- CLP
- GHS
- California Proposition 65
- SVHC
- CE
Divisions executing — 03
Physicochemical
- Chemical characterisation and identification
- Physicochemical property determination
- Stability and shelf life
- Packaging and container compatibility
- Transport worthiness
Human health
- Acute toxicity
- Skin and eye irritation / serious damage
- Skin sensitisation
- Subacute, subchronic and chronic toxicity
- Developmental and reproductive toxicity
- Endocrine disruptor screening
- Carcinogenicity
Environmental
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation potential
- Adsorption, desorption and mobility
- Aquatic and terrestrial toxicity
- Environmental risk assessment
Specialist declarations
- Chromium VI testing
- SVHC declarations
- CE label support
- Occupational exposure assessment
Nutrition, microbiology, allergens, contaminants and shelf-life in one panel
Release-and-label testing for additives and finished products, extended with the toxicological and stability work that a new additive approval requires.
Assembled against
- GLP
- FSSAI
- Codex
- ISO
Divisions executing — 03
Nutritional analysis
- Proximate analysis — moisture, ash, fat, protein, carbohydrate
- Vitamin and mineral content
- Dietary fibre
- Fatty acid profile
- Caloric value
Microbiology
- Total viable count
- Pathogen detection — Salmonella, E. coli, Listeria
- Yeast and mould count
- Coliform and Enterobacteriaceae count
Allergens & contaminants
- Allergen-specific ELISA and PCR
- Gluten testing
- Mycotoxins — aflatoxins, ochratoxin
- Heavy metals — lead, mercury, cadmium, arsenic
- Pesticide and veterinary drug residues
- PAH analysis
- Gamma radiation level measurement
Stability & shelf life
- Microbiological stability
- Oxidative stability
- Nutrient degradation
- Sensory and organoleptic evaluation
- Temperature and light stress testing
- Packaging integrity
If none of them fit
Start from the authority instead.
A package is a shortcut through the catalogue, not a boundary around it. Where the submission is unusual, the sector pages set out the frameworks in full — and a study can be designed from scratch.
Custom studies- 01AgrochemicalFull registration packages — ecotoxicity, residue, environmental fate, metabolism and field efficacyOECD · CIBRC · EPA · EFSA
- 02Industrial ChemicalsREACH, RoHS, CLP, GHS and California Proposition 65 compliance dataREACH · RoHS · CLP · GHS
- 03Food & Feed AdditivesNutritional, microbiological, allergen and contaminant analysis with shelf-life supportGLP · FSSAI · Codex · ISO
Next step
Send us the dossier you have to file.
Scoping starts from the authority that will read the submission, not from the study list — so the fastest route to a real quotation is telling us the market, the submission type and the test item.
Stage 01 · Scope — Regulatory strategy · guideline mapping · study design